Thursday, July 21, 2016
Mobile Application Testing To Ensure Excellence?
By claire mackerras3:37 AMFunctional Testing, Mobile Application Testing. Mobile Testing, Software Testing
No comments:
You have developed a mobile application and probably have
tested it on an emulator and a browser or two and now you think it’s ready for
release. Before this is done, let’s consider the state of the application. At
this stage, the mobile application not only appears to function correctly,
which most probably is a good thing, right?
Can an emulator really show you how a real device should
work when used with a mobile application? Certainly not. A web browser can show
you what you mobile app will look like on a real device, but there are many
important areas of functionality that it cannot show you like the memory usage,
the CPU difference, the touch screen functionality.
There’s merely a slight difference between the ‘expected’
and the ‘actual’ behavior on a real device. So once you have decided to test on
a real device, there are some important things you should be considering:
Which
mobile devices are needed?
There are numerous hardware versions and operating system
versions associated with each device. This initially boons a dilemma, but we
can exclude older firmware (operating systems) and hardware, why? As per facts,
99% of the users will upgrade to the latest firmware whenever possible to gain
the benefit of and new enhanced functionality and fixed bugs.
Yet again, you can exclude older versions of hardware, mainly
if it is several years old and no longer supports the latest available firmware.
Most users with these types of devices will upgrade when their device appears
to be out of date. To be brief, aim to test on the latest firmware and hardware;
this basically gives you a longer period of mobile App endurance.
What if you
can’t afford to buy real devices?
Most carriers usually offer mobile devices at cheap prices
if you sign a lengthy contract with them. This does not seem to be a viable
option as you just want to use it for testing. Devices can be bought without
contracts too, but that’s an expensive bet again, especially when you are to test
iOS apps.
The most economical testing solution is to use devices of
the company you do are testing the apps for. They already have made huge
investments in purchasing the hardware, so you can definitely use their
devices.
Should I
get a certified App test done before its release?
As a developer, you are just one set of eyes. It is really
important to get every app tested before its release. Get it done by your
peers, and then by in-house or outsourced software testers. This is vital as
once your app is released and out, you cannot really do anything about it, and
if may have diverse effects on the feedback and your sales.
The pluses of using a professional app testing service is
that they have experience of testing a variety of techniques, such as Functional,
Performance, Usability, security testing etc. on many other applications
formerly. These professional testers will know where to look for the defects in
your app and provide you with an all-important degree of confidence which you
will get only by an experienced tester.
Which
network providers should I use?
It is contingent to the country where the testing process is
being carried out. As a matter of fact, as long as the testing takes into
account network specific testing, the carrier should not matter at all.
For instance, an application tester will customarily test on
poor, medium and good signal strengths to test the behavior of your app under
some conditions. Hence it doesn’t really matter if these tests are carried out
only on Wi-Fi networks but also on a 3G carrier providing network.
Therefore, to conclude, you’ll certainly have to spend a
fortune so as to get efficient results for mobile application testing. With some prudence, you can meritoriously reduce the number of
real devices you need for the testing purpose and not have to pay your riches
to ensure the quality of your mobile application.
Bugraptors is a
professional web and mobile testing company providing the best testing services
around the globe.
Wednesday, July 20, 2016
How to Reproduce a Non Reproducible Bug
In our day-to-day life we all have various tasks to complete. Some of them are easy and the remaining is counted as Challenges. A software defect once found should be reproducible so that the tester can report with conviction, developer can fix with ease and the Quality Assurance (QA) team can close with confidence.
Being a software tester, we also face some challenges, such as Non-Reproducible bugs. Bugs which are not easy or cannot be reproduced again are termed as Non-Reproducible bugs which we often find harder to isolate and to get them fix becomes a difficult task.
Read More Here at https://www.bugraptors.com/blog/non-reproducible-bug
Thursday, July 14, 2016
Deciding upon Automation Testing and Manual Testing
By claire mackerras3:15 AMAutomated and Manual Testing Services, automated testing services, Automation Testing, Manual Testing, Software Testing Services
No comments:
Manual testing appeared way before
automation testing came into existence. And this is why it is believed to be
the most reliable process in software testing. Even after many contradictions,
this is prone to errors because of the fact that this offers a big chance for
testers to commit errors. And thus, automation testing was created. It is
believed that automation is the key for having a successful software process;
the experts recommend that one should not jump to the conclusion of using the
automation testing procedures. There are some guidelines that a tester should
check on before turning to automation testing.
As manual and automation testing
both have respective pros and cons, one would perhaps wonder which among the
two should be considered as better. The genuine answer here is that both of
these processes are ideal for software testing. Yet there is a need for a
developer to govern the right time regarding when he should go for either of
the processes.
So, let’s proceed with the pros of
automation testing, as they say a lot of benefits can be gained here. Automation testing
allows running a series of tests multiple times. It proves to be an advantage
for those who want to run a code that often changes so that the tester is able
to catch the regressions on time. It also allows execution of the automation
process in mainstream scenarios and helps in testing huge test matrices. This
relates to different languages on various operating system platforms.
On the other hand, the cons of
automation testing include high costs as writing test cases cost more when
compared to manual testing. Adding to this, it does not allow mechanizing
visual references.
Example: if you are not able to tell what tool you are
using, you will have to alter it to manual testing.
About manual testing, the pros
include the occurrence of the test cases that are to be run at the most two
times and thus, you will not have to automate it which eventually saves more on
the costs.
Apart from this, the tester is permitted to perform random/ adhoc
tests. Based on the reports, these types of tests can find more bugs than with
automation. More time that the tester
spends on testing the software, the greater get the chances of finding the user
bugs.
Manual tests are undeniably
time-consuming, and in case of a new build, the tester is required to re-run
the necessary tests. At this time, if you are facing trouble deciding on
whether you should automate or not, glance on the tools that you’d be using.
Also check if you will get back on the investment when you automate the testing
process for a particular program.
Still not clear about the processes? Get in touch with Bugraptors, a one stop solution for all testing needs. Visit the website here.
Wednesday, July 13, 2016
Salient Tips for Writing Effective Test Cases
A test case is a state under which a tester will decide whether an application/software system is working as it is originally established for it to do. It will decide whether a software program has passed or failed.
It may take many test cases to decide that a software program is considered successful to be released. Test case writing plays an important role and makes a test case an important part of the test execution process.
Read more at Writing effective test cases
Thursday, July 7, 2016
Challenges While Performing Mobile Testing
By claire mackerras5:05 AMFunctional Testing, Mobile Testing, Software Testing, Usability Testing
No comments:
Mobile market growth is increasing day by day. Mobile industry has been skyrocketing for several years, as consumers spend more time on multiple devices and mostly utilize mobile content.
The hardware has improved dramatically over the last few years, but it’s the software that truly unleashes the potential of devices. What’s really driving is the incredible success of smart phones and tablets in the application market.
Wednesday, June 29, 2016
Performance Testing On Mobile Applications
By claire mackerras2:12 AMResponsive Design, Software Testing, software testing service
No comments:
Performance testing is type of testing performed to evaluate the performance of an applications. It measures the responsiveness, Speed, Scalability, Stability with different load conditions.
Performance testing of applications is done to ensure that applications they are working as expected with different load conditions.
Read More at https://www.bugraptors.com/blog/performance-testing-on-mobile-applications
Performance testing of applications is done to ensure that applications they are working as expected with different load conditions.
Read More at https://www.bugraptors.com/blog/performance-testing-on-mobile-applications
Tuesday, June 21, 2016
Return Of Investment For Automated Testing
Test automation is often seen as a way to reduce the cost of the
testing. It increases the test coverage, effectiveness of the testing
and reduces the testing cycle. Many organizations consider automation
testing as a vital step in establishing a mature Q&A program. But,
manual testing can never be ruled out completely.
Automation testing is more costly than manual software testing,
but this higher cost is a long term investments for your automation.
Automated testing is a solution to a common business problem. And how to
make high quality software with complex technology under competitive
pressure. Automated testing provides the cost-effective solution to this
problem.
Read More here : http://www.bugraptors.com/return-of-investment-for-automated-testing
Thursday, June 16, 2016
Why Your Website Should Be Responsive?
By claire mackerras2:42 AMResponsive Design, Responsive Web Design, Why website should be responsive
No comments:
A responsive design responds to different display sizes by changing the size and layout depending on the device.
The main benefit is that mobile users will receive essentially the same experience of your website as your desktop visitors.
Responsive web design is becoming gradually more popular and many large companies have started to take this approach. Near the end of 2012 Microsoft released a redesign of their commercial website.
Read more at http://www.bugraptors.com/why-responsive-website
Tuesday, June 7, 2016
5 Things Testers Should Keep in Mind While Testing the Games
Gaming industry has a huge wide scope in the market. Millions of games are launched in every year, on various iOS, Android and Windows platforms.
Either it is online games or offline games, a 3rd person user or first person, a tester must be ready to tackle different obstacles that may come his way.
Either it is online games or offline games, a 3rd person user or first person, a tester must be ready to tackle different obstacles that may come his way.
Here are the 5 things which tester should keep in mind while testing a game:
- Multiplayer Feature
- Game Authenticity Challenges
- Testing in Various Game Engines
- Ensuring Accurate Social Integration
- Game' Ability to Withstand Heavy, Concurrent Load
Read more about these in detail at: http://www.bugraptors.com/things-to-keep-in-mind-while-testing-games.
Monday, January 18, 2016
Sanity Testing and Its Importance
Sanity Testing: Sanity Testing is a part of Regression testing . It is performed by the test team to do some basic testing when they don’t have enough time to test the whole application. It is used to determine if all the features and functionality of an application is still working fine after a minor change or not. Sanity testing is performed to make sure that all the errors or bugs have been removed and there are no more issues introduced due to recent changes made within an application. It is performed when Smoke testing is done , accepted by Q&A team for further testing and verifies the major functionality with finer details.
It is usually unscripted and helps to identify the dependent missing functionality. It is narrow and deep testing that focuses on one or a few areas of functionality. When there are some minor issues within the software and a new build is obtained after fixing the issues then instead of doing complete regression testing sanity is performed on that build. Sanity testing helps to avoid the wastage of time and cost if the build is failed. Sanity testing helps to check that after minor fixes done in a small section of code, the functionality is working as expected & not breaking related functionality .
When we Perform Sanity Testing?
Sanity testing is performed when development team needs to know quick state of the product after they have done changes in the code or there is some controlled code change in a feature to fix any critical issue, and stringent release time-frame does not allow complete regression testing.
Importance of Sanity Testing
1. Sanity testing makes the tester confident about the functionality of an application.
2. Sanity testing assures that the part of the system or methodology works roughly as expected.
3. Using sanity testing the testers makes sure that the basic functionality of an application is working fine and the proposed functionality works roughly as expected.
4. By performing sanity testing on a Mobile Device Testing will be sure that the application will be working fine on other mobile devices having the same operating system.
5. Sanity testing is not documented and thus it saves time and is easy to perform.
6. Sanity testing gives a rough idea of the functionality of the application and the number of uncertainties in the application due to bug fixes.
7. Sanity testing is beneficial when the time for a particular project is limited and tester has already checked the project in detail.
8. Sanity testing does not require many testers and thus saving testing efforts.
9. Gives a quick state of the product to the developers after they have done changes in the code.
It is usually unscripted and helps to identify the dependent missing functionality. It is narrow and deep testing that focuses on one or a few areas of functionality. When there are some minor issues within the software and a new build is obtained after fixing the issues then instead of doing complete regression testing sanity is performed on that build. Sanity testing helps to avoid the wastage of time and cost if the build is failed. Sanity testing helps to check that after minor fixes done in a small section of code, the functionality is working as expected & not breaking related functionality .
When we Perform Sanity Testing?
Sanity testing is performed when development team needs to know quick state of the product after they have done changes in the code or there is some controlled code change in a feature to fix any critical issue, and stringent release time-frame does not allow complete regression testing.
Importance of Sanity Testing
1. Sanity testing makes the tester confident about the functionality of an application.
2. Sanity testing assures that the part of the system or methodology works roughly as expected.
3. Using sanity testing the testers makes sure that the basic functionality of an application is working fine and the proposed functionality works roughly as expected.
4. By performing sanity testing on a Mobile Device Testing will be sure that the application will be working fine on other mobile devices having the same operating system.
5. Sanity testing is not documented and thus it saves time and is easy to perform.
6. Sanity testing gives a rough idea of the functionality of the application and the number of uncertainties in the application due to bug fixes.
7. Sanity testing is beneficial when the time for a particular project is limited and tester has already checked the project in detail.
8. Sanity testing does not require many testers and thus saving testing efforts.
9. Gives a quick state of the product to the developers after they have done changes in the code.