Deciding upon Automation Testing and Manual Testing

Manual testing appeared way before automation testing came into existence. And this is why it is believed to be the most reliable process in software testing. Even after many contradictions, this is prone to errors because of the fact that this offers a big chance for testers to commit errors. And thus, automation testing was created. It is believed that automation is the key for having a successful software process; the experts recommend that one should not jump to the conclusion of using the automation testing procedures. There are some guidelines that a tester should check on before turning to automation testing.

As manual and automation testing both have respective pros and cons, one would perhaps wonder which among the two should be considered as better. The genuine answer here is that both of these processes are ideal for software testing. Yet there is a need for a developer to govern the right time regarding when he should go for either of the processes.

So, let’s proceed with the pros of automation testing, as they say a lot of benefits can be gained here. Automation testing allows running a series of tests multiple times. It proves to be an advantage for those who want to run a code that often changes so that the tester is able to catch the regressions on time. It also allows execution of the automation process in mainstream scenarios and helps in testing huge test matrices. This relates to different languages on various operating system platforms.

On the other hand, the cons of automation testing include high costs as writing test cases cost more when compared to manual testing. Adding to this, it does not allow mechanizing visual references. 

Example: if you are not able to tell what tool you are using, you will have to alter it to manual testing.

About manual testing, the pros include the occurrence of the test cases that are to be run at the most two times and thus, you will not have to automate it which eventually saves more on the costs. 

Apart from this, the tester is permitted to perform random/ adhoc tests. Based on the reports, these types of tests can find more bugs than with automation.  More time that the tester spends on testing the software, the greater get the chances of finding the user bugs.

Manual tests are undeniably time-consuming, and in case of a new build, the tester is required to re-run the necessary tests. At this time, if you are facing trouble deciding on whether you should automate or not, glance on the tools that you’d be using. Also check if you will get back on the investment when you automate the testing process for a particular program.

Still not clear about the processes? Get in touch with Bugraptors, a one stop solution for all testing needs. Visit the website here.