Manual testing appeared way before
automation testing came into existence. And this is why it is believed to be
the most reliable process in software testing. Even after many contradictions,
this is prone to errors because of the fact that this offers a big chance for
testers to commit errors. And thus, automation testing was created. It is
believed that automation is the key for having a successful software process;
the experts recommend that one should not jump to the conclusion of using the
automation testing procedures. There are some guidelines that a tester should
check on before turning to automation testing.
As manual and automation testing
both have respective pros and cons, one would perhaps wonder which among the
two should be considered as better. The genuine answer here is that both of
these processes are ideal for software testing. Yet there is a need for a
developer to govern the right time regarding when he should go for either of
the processes.
So, let’s proceed with the pros of
automation testing, as they say a lot of benefits can be gained here. Automation testing
allows running a series of tests multiple times. It proves to be an advantage
for those who want to run a code that often changes so that the tester is able
to catch the regressions on time. It also allows execution of the automation
process in mainstream scenarios and helps in testing huge test matrices. This
relates to different languages on various operating system platforms.
On the other hand, the cons of
automation testing include high costs as writing test cases cost more when
compared to manual testing. Adding to this, it does not allow mechanizing
visual references.
Example: if you are not able to tell what tool you are
using, you will have to alter it to manual testing.
About manual testing, the pros
include the occurrence of the test cases that are to be run at the most two
times and thus, you will not have to automate it which eventually saves more on
the costs.
Apart from this, the tester is permitted to perform random/ adhoc
tests. Based on the reports, these types of tests can find more bugs than with
automation. More time that the tester
spends on testing the software, the greater get the chances of finding the user
bugs.
Manual tests are undeniably
time-consuming, and in case of a new build, the tester is required to re-run
the necessary tests. At this time, if you are facing trouble deciding on
whether you should automate or not, glance on the tools that you’d be using.
Also check if you will get back on the investment when you automate the testing
process for a particular program.
Still not clear about the processes? Get in touch with Bugraptors, a one stop
solution for all testing needs. Visit the website here.
